Trump on military action in Iran: "I may proceed, or I may choose not to."
Date: June 2025
By: 24HNEWSAMERICA
President Donald Trump recently made headlines with an intentionally vague yet impactful declaration regarding potential U.S. military action in Iran:
“I may proceed, or I may choose not to.”https://hoorayattract.com/xwp85ady?key=8542e2ad0a5dde538273ea4a25016ffe
This statement underscores the unpredictability and high stakes of U.S. policy in the Middle East, particularly amid Israel’s recent strikes on Iranian territory. Here's a deep dive into the background, context, implications, and possible outcomes of this statement.
1. What prompted the remark?
Escalation in the Israel‑Iran conflict: On June 13–17, 2025, Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian nuclear and military sites, raising fears of wider regional war.
U.S. deployments in the Middle East:
Reinforcement of U.S. air assets near Iran and Europe, including tanker and fighter aircraft .
Naval repositioning, with aircraft carriers and destroyers staging in the Eastern Mediterranean .
Diplomacy stalled: Scheduled U.S.–Iran talks in Oman on June 15 were called off amid military escalation .
2. Trump’s statement: context and meaning
On June 18, 2025, speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said:
“I may do it, I may not do it. Nobody knows what I’m going to do.”
This was framed as an open-ended warning that U.S. participation in strikes on Iran was under active consideration—but not guaranteed.
He elaborated:
There’s still a window for negotiations, “Nothing’s too late”—suggesting possible diplomatic avenues
He emphasized U.S. intelligence capabilities, even revealing knowledge of the whereabouts of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, but ruled out assassination “for now”
3. Reactions in Washington and Tehran
In Washington:
Trump convened national-security advisors in the Situation Room to weigh possible actions.Congressional concerns surfaced, with ongoing debate over the War Powers Resolution and constitutional authorizations
In Tehran:
Ayatollah Khamenei responded, warning any U.S. military intervention “will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage”
Iran’s diplomat, Ali Bahreini, noted that “any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region”
4. Strategic options on the table
A. Military escalation
Possible U.S. involvement may include:
Strikes on hardened nuclear sites like Fordow, using bunker-buster munitions (e.g., GBU‑57 MOP)
Deployment of B‑2 stealth bombers and refueling assets in Diego Garcia and Europe
Naval support via aircraft carriers and missile-defense ships .
B. Diplomacy and pressure
Trump's “maximum pressure” sanctions campaign—blocking oil exports, reinstating sanctions—is intended to incentivize Tehran
Trump hinted at face-to-face diplomacy, referencing Iranian overtures to visit the White House and revisiting a nuclear deal.
5. Risks & rewards of U.S. intervention
Benefits:
A tactical blow to Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
Reinforcement of U.S.–Israel alliance and display of global deterrence.
Risks:
Possible Iranian retaliation via missile attacks on U.S. Gulf bases or allies .A cascade in global oil prices, especially via Strait of Hormuz disruptions.Potential escalation to all‑out regional war .Legal pushback from Congress over authorization .
6. What comes next?
Next 24–48 hours are critical: top officials say diplomatic or military breakthroughs could emerge soon .Additional troop and equipment deployments suggest readiness, not immediate action. Many see Trump’s statement as strategic ambiguity—used to pressure Tehran while keeping options open.
7. What you should watch
Indicator Why it matters
Deployment of bunker busters Indicates readiness to strike nuclear sites like Fordow or Natanz
U.S.–Iran or U.S.–Israel chatter Could signal shift toward diplomatic resolution or military support
Congressional debate Will shape Trump’s legal authority to authorize action
Tehran or regional mobilization Any overt military movement may signal escalation
Oil prices and global markets Reflect immediate market response to crisis and future tensions.
Conclusion
Trump’s statement—“I may proceed, or I may choose not to”—is more than press brinkmanship. It signals a critical crossroads: will the U.S. strike Iran, lean into diplomacy, or maintain ambiguous pressure? In doing so, it places enormous power in Trump’s executive hands—and signals to Tehran, Jerusalem, and Washington that the next few days could determine the direction of U.S. involvement in a potential Middle Eastern conflict.
Trump Iran military action
Trump may proceed may not
Iran surrender ultimatum
Bunker buster bombs Fordow
legal War Powers Iran
(Complete list available—let me know if you'd like the full table!)
Need this turned into a downloadable PDF, with charts, citations, or embedded video highlights? I can add those next.
0 Comments